05). The results expand the knowledge on use of medications among elderly Brazilians, emphasizing the need to improve pharmaceutical care focused on this subgroup of the population.”
“Background aims. Donor-derived vertebral bone marrow (BM) has been proposed to promote chimerism in solid organ transplantation with cadaveric organs. Reports of successful weaning
from immunosuppression in patients receiving directed donor transplants in combination with donor BM or blood cells and novel peri-transplant immunosuppression has renewed interest in implementing similar protocols with cadaveric organs. Methods. We performed six pre-clinical full-scale separations to adapt vertebral BM preparations to a good manufacturing practice (GMP) environment. Vertebral bodies L4-T8 were transported to a class 10 000 clean room, cleaned of soft Elafibranor order tissue, divided and crushed in a prototype bone grinder. Bone
fragments were irrigated with medium containing saline, albumin, DNAse and gentamicin, and strained through stainless steel sieves. Additional cells were eluted after two rounds of agitation using a prototype BM tumbler. Results. The majority of recovered cells (70.9 +/- 14.1%, mean +/- SD) were eluted directly from the crushed bone, whereas Rigosertib order 22.3% and 5.9% were eluted after the first and second rounds of tumbling, respectively. Cells were pooled and filtered (500, 200 mu m) using a BM collection kit. Larger lumbar vertebrae yielded about 1.6 times the cells of thoracic vertebrae. The average product yielded 5.2 +/- 1.2 x 10(10) total cells, 6.2 +/- 2.2 x 10(8) of which were CD45(+) CD34(+). Viability was 96.6 +/- 1.9% and 99.1 +/- 0.8%, respectively. Multicolor flow cytometry revealed distinct populations of CD34(+) CD90(+) CD117(dim) hematopoietic stem cells (15.5 +/- 7.5% of the CD34(+) cells) and
CD45(-) Selleckchem JQ1 CD73(+) CD105(+) mesenchymal stromal cells (0.04 +/- 0.04% of the total cells). Conclusions. This procedure can be used to prepare clinical-grade cells suitable for use in human allotransplantation in a GMP environment.”
“The cytopathologic diagnosis of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma can be problematic as there are several components of the differential diagnosis that share common cytomorphologic features. In this study, we report the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) findings of 16 basaloid squamous cell carcinoma cases and compare those cases to 16 cases of small cell carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma FNA cases ever reported. The following cytomorphologic features were compared for both tumors: cohesive tissue fragments, single cells, adenoid cystic-like features (cribriform pseudoglandular lumina with hyaline materials), necrosis, nuclear size, nuclear molding, nucleoli, cytoplasm, and the presence of single keratinized cells.