Other DGM patients lacked molecular confirmation and were therefore included as a separate group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups but for theoretical reasons the division was maintained. As illustrated in Figure 1, a tendency for a survival benefit suggests the putative presence of milder types of muscular dystrophy within the group “clinical diagnosis Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical only”. It is conceivable that this effect was caused by some boys having BMD, since the median survival of BMD patients amounts to 42 years (26). Age

at and cause of death are important clinical parameters. In 13 of our 45 deceased patients the cause of death was unknown. In literature, major reported causes of death are heart failure and respiratory insufficiency (5). Due to interviews with medical laymen, cardiac aspects like cardiomyopathy have not been considered. We understood every cause of death to be associated with the disease DMD and included patients no matter what cause of death they died of. Reports Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical from Newcastle (27, 28) and a prospective study of 43 patients with DMD by Kohler et al. (29) determined survival in terms of years of life, facilitating Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical a comparison with the present study. Eagle et al. (27) divided their subjects into groups according to the decade in which they died. A later study by the same authors focused on the life-prolonging effects of ventilation and spinal

surgery (28). Our data were not sufficient for survival analyses of a separate surgery group, since only 12 of our www.selleckchem.com/products/Gefitinib.html cohort of molecularly confirmed 67 patients had undergone spinal surgery. We therefore compared the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 2002 study by Eagle et al. (27) to the present report. Dividing our patients up into groups “died before 2000″ and “died after 2000″, a difference in survival due to

use of ventilation emerged (Fisher’s exact test p < 0,001). As reported by a number of other authors, our study confirms that ventilation improves life expectancy. For example, Yasuma et al. (30) reported a median survival for non-ventilated Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical patients of 20.1 years and Eagle et al. (27) reported 19.3 years. In contrast, median survival of patients using ventilation amounted to 30.4 years (30) and 25.3 years (27). Since our study did not intent to evaluate therapies, mode of ventilation and indication to ventilation were not separately studied. We only recorded median age at introduction of ventilation. Studies considering protocols for ventilation showed the impact of L-NAME HCl home nocturnal ventilation on longevity. Recent studies on NIV revealed an improved median survival of 31 and 35 years respectively (31, 29). Compared to our study, factors like study design and other interventions influencing survival (e. g. spinal surgery, treatment of heart conditions) could explain this impressive survival advantage. However, our observed difference between non-ventilated and ventilated patients (19.0 vs. 27.0 years) clearly supports the important impact ventilation has on survival.