Conventional gas was previously the main form of liquefied natural gas (LNG) but over the last several decades this has changed with the development of new technologies making extraction of newly

discovered unconventional gas resources feasible and economic. The main types of unconventional gas sources are coal seam gas (CSG, also known as coal bed methane), shale gas and tight gas. In Australia, CSG is the most exploited unconventional gas resource. During the last 15 years, the growth of exploration activity has been substantial, with the number of CSG wells drilled annually in Queensland increasing from 10 in the early 1990s to more than 600 in 2009–2010 (Queensland Government, 2011). Estimated CSG reserves in Australia now exceed conventional gas reserves (Day, 2009, RLMS, 2009 and Geoscience Australia and BREE, 2014). One of the areas with high CSG potential in Australia is the Galilee Basin, located in Selleck Oligomycin A central Queensland (Fig. 1). The Galilee Basin is overlain by, and in contact with, the Eromanga Basin, a component of the Great Artesian Basin (GAB) which covers approximately 22% of the Australian continent and is a significant groundwater resource

selleck products (Ransley and Smerdon, 2012). The Galilee Basin contains relatively thick Permian age coal beds which have not been exploited in the past for gas resources due to their significant depth and the distance to the principal markets (Holland et al., 2008). In order to enable CSG production, high volumes of groundwater need to be extracted to reduce the hydrostatic pressure that keeps the gas adsorbed on the coal. There are two fundamental concerns in regard to this procedure: (a) how will the brackish/saline water typically contained in coal-bearing formations (e.g. Van Voast, 2003) be disposed of or reused

at the surface and (b) will extraction of groundwater from the coal measures impact on water quality or groundwater pressures in adjacent artesian Etofibrate aquifers of the Great Artesian Basin. Prior to the production and development of CSG resources, it is essential to determine the hydrogeological characteristics of a basin and its setting, and in particular the potential impacts that extraction of groundwater and any depressurisation may have on vertical connectivity between aquifers and aquitards (Harrison et al., 2000, Rice et al., 2002 and Taulis and Milke, 2007). An important part of this assessment is the identification of faults, their influence on the geometry of aquifers/aquitards and their role as potential connectivity pathways. Fault zones can behave as possible conduits to regional groundwater flow, or as barriers or both (e.g. Caine et al., 1996, Rawling et al., 2001 and Bense and Person, 2006). Examples of faults acting as barriers have been reported from offshore hydrocarbon reservoirs (e.g. Bredehoeft et al., 1992 and Knott et al., 1996) but also from onshore sedimentary basins (e.g. Bense and Van Balen, 2004).