Every other question was reverse-coded. The results of these surveys were aggregated by group

and compared. Results The goal of the DataPall EMR was to efficiently manage patient records and generate comprehensive reports on patient histories and services provided by palliative care providers. In the first two timed tasks of this study, participants were asked to locate the most recent appointment for a see more sample patient, first using Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the existing paper registers and second using the DataPall system. Figure  5 depicts the results from these two tasks. Among all participants (trained and untrained), the mean time required to locate an appointment in the paper Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical registers was 144.9 seconds. The mean time required to locate an appointment in the DataPall system was 58.2 seconds, representing a 59.7% reduction in the time required to locate a single record. Utilizing a Wilcoxon rank sum test, the difference in performance on these two parallel tasks is significant at the p<0.001

level. Moreover, as demonstrated in Figure  5, this relationship was observed in both trained and untrained participant groups (p<0.05 for each). The average time needed to locate the appointment using DataPall was very similar in absolute terms between trained and untrained groups at 58.5 versus 58.0 seconds, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical respectively, while the median times for this task indicated a more pronounced difference between the two groups at 53. 5 seconds (trained) and 45.0 seconds (untrained). The difference in distribution between the two groups is statistically significant

at the p<0.01 level. Figure 5 DataPall reduces the average time needed to find a recent patient’s appointment (p=0.00057). Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical The DataPall EMR is designed to generate aggregate reports of clinical activity and patient history automatically, assuming that patient appointments in the given time period have been entered into the system. Using DataPall, participants generated a report of clinical data during a month-long time period in Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical an average of 54.8 seconds. The trained users generated this report in 45.8 seconds, on average, while the untrained users required an average of 67.6 seconds to complete this task. Similarly, participants were able to generate printable patient reports for the sample isothipendyl patient efficiently in 42.9 seconds on average. Training did not exhibit a statistically significant difference in the amount of time required to generate these reports. Participants in both the trained and untrained cohorts rated the usability of the DataPall system almost identically, with an overall median SUS of 77.5 with a standard deviation of 10.2. All participants rated DataPall between 65 and 97.5 on the SUS, providing relatively consistent overall consensus regarding the ease of use.