The drug is absorbed into the enterocyte compartment, where enzymatic first pass metabolism can occur by either CYPs and/or UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), following Michaelis–Menten kinetics; with only the drug’s free fraction (fraction unbound (fu)) being susceptible to metabolism. Alternatively, the Qgut model ( Yang et al., 2007) can be employed for the estimation of the first pass gut wall metabolism. The distribution of CYPs and UGTs enzymes along the GI tract is also

incorporated in the ADAM model. The non-metabolized fraction enters the portal vein by means of blood flow limited processes and subsequently enters the liver, where additional first pass metabolism can occur prior to reaching click here the systemic circulation. A detailed description of the ADAM model within the Simcyp® population-based simulator can be found elsewhere ( Jamei et al., 2009b and Jamei et al., 2009c). The selection of the ADAM model was based on its inhibitors capability to simulate drug absorption and first pass metabolism, taking into account the factors that have an impact on these processes. To investigate the impact of different formulations and the relevant drug properties on fa, FG, and AUC a factorial study was designed ( Fig. 1). A set of five release profiles,

representative of five different formulations, were defined by varying the release rate constant (krel) from 0.096 h−1 to 4.6 h−1 selleck screening library in Eq. (1) equation(1) Frel(t)=1-e-kreltFrel(t)=1-e-kreltwhere Frel(t) is the fraction of the dose released from the formulation as a function of time (h). The five release profiles were representative of two immediate release (IR) tablets and three controlled release (CR) tablets. The

profiles were designed to release 90% of the drug content within 0.5, 1, 6, 12 and 24 h, resulting in a krel of 4.6, 2.3, 0.38, 0.19, and 0.096 h−1, respectively (t90). Six drug-specific parameters were selected based on their importance in defining mafosfamide oral bioavailability and were systematically modified to generate a set of virtual compounds. The modified parameters included: solubility (mg/mL); human jejunal effective permeability, Peff (10−4 cm/s); maximal CYP3A4-mediated metabolic rate, Vmax,CYP3A4 (pmol/min/mg microsomal protein); CYP3A4 affinity, Km,CYP3A4 (μM); maximal P-gp-mediated efflux rate, Jmax,P-gp (pmol/min); and P-gp affinity, Km,P-gp (μM). In addition, each parameter was assigned five different values. Hence, the number of virtual compounds amounted to 15,625. For each virtual compound five simulations were carried out, one for each of the release profiles described above, resulting in a total of 78,125 simulations (57). The specific ranges for each parameter were derived from the literature and were representative of the values obtained experimentally.