Therefore, the molecular mechanisms described above may have been

selected because they achieve Treg cell lineage stability and prevent off-target, innocuous antigen-specific responses during inflammation.[46] In contrast, Th17 cells represent a potent inflammatory Th cell subset endowed with the ability to augment adaptive responses, tissue inflammation, and neutrophil recruitment, and are therefore often juxtaposed with Treg cells as frequent culprits of autoimmune disease.[25] Indeed, studies from both Rudensky and colleagues and Littman and colleagues validated the functional importance learn more of Treg or Th17 cell regulatory elements through comparison with genome-wide association study data. For example, both sites of Treg-specific chromatin accessibility, and binding sites for the core Th17 cell transcription factors overlapped with different mutations linked to ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis, diseases in which Th17 cells and Treg cells have opposing roles and where dysregulation of either cell type can result in disease.[12, 14] Intuitively then, when not dysregulated by genetic lesions or environmental toxins, Th17 cell environmental

responsiveness and lineage plasticity can allow for the harnessing of their potent Selleck Talazoparib inflammatory potential to fight infection and resolve tissue damage while assuring their appropriate restraint and reprogramming under homeostatic conditions. Similarly, Th1 and Th2 cells have encoded appropriate environmental responsiveness and stability into their transcriptional programmes, enabling the maintenance of type-specific memory responses with some capacity for adaptation. Both TBET and GATA3 reinforce their own expression directly, Sitaxentan through transcriptional positive feedback loops, and indirectly, through enhancement of cytokine

receptor expression and autocrine signals upstream of MRF activation.[47] The TBET target HLX, and perhaps TBET itself can activate TBET gene expression.[23, 48] For both TBET and GATA3, retroviral expression can induce transcription of the endogenous genes.[23, 49] As with FOXP3 autoregulation, these cell intrinsic positive feedback loops confer a degree of environmental buffering and thereby bolster lineage fidelity. Indeed, Th1 or Th2 cells that have undergone several rounds of division, demethylated CpG motifs at key lineage genes, and established transcriptional autoregulatory loops, become highly committed.[50, 51] In contrast, newly differentiated Th1 and Th2 cells are highly responsive to reprogramming following exposure to alternative lineage-instructing cytokines.