This literature review, employing a systematic approach, contributes to the expanding recognition of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within family-owned businesses, a domain that has seen considerable progress over the last several years. The exploration of family firm-CSR dynamics, including drivers, activities, outcomes, and contextual influences, now offers the opportunity for a more coherent and in-depth understanding of this phenomenon, facilitating a more organized structure for existing research. To characterize the research field, we scrutinized 122 peer-reviewed articles in prestigious journals to pinpoint the central problems investigated. A dearth of research on CSR outcomes in family firms is readily apparent from the results. While the role of family firms in research is rising, a study focusing on family outcomes (such as family position within the community and emotional well-being) rather than the business's results is still required. This review of the literature examines the current state of research on CSR in family firms and argues for the strategic use of CSR activities for these firms. Furthermore, our examination reveals a black box, illustrating how CSR interconnects various antecedents and consequences. To generate the best possible outcomes, firms generally need to comprehend the value proposition of the black box in the context of resource allocation. These outcomes have led to nine research questions, which we believe will inspire future researchers.

Family firms, despite their frequent practice of community engagement through family foundations and business-oriented CSR, encounter ambiguity in deciphering the interrelationship between these distinct approaches to community involvement. Academic studies posit that business organizations with family foundations might show less concern for community-based corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities, since family foundations could be more efficient in acquiring socio-emotional wealth (SEW). This suggests a potential connection between these business practices and reduced ethical behavior. We refine the socioemotional wealth (SEW) model with the addition of instrumental stakeholder theory and cue consistency principles to contradict these speculations. Our hypothesis is that business organizations endeavor to ensure consistency between their activities within these two domains. Data encompassing the period from 2008 to 2018, collected from the 95 largest US public family firms, whose business operations also support private foundations, demonstrates a positive link between family foundation philanthropy and corporate social responsibility initiatives in the community. Additionally, we offer proof of the parameters within this relationship, indicating a weaker link for companies without shared family names and a stronger connection in firms with family leaders also managing their family's foundations.

The contemporary understanding of modern slavery emphasizes its presence, hidden in plain sight, within the home territories of multinational corporations. Despite this, the body of business scholarship on contemporary slavery has, until recently, been disproportionately directed towards the intricate network of product supply chains. In order to tackle this, we emphasize the numerous institutional pressures confronting the UK's construction industry, and the managers of its companies, regarding the modern slavery threat to their on-site workforce. A unique data set derived from 30 in-depth interviews with construction firm managers and directors reveals two significant institutional logics, market and state, integral to understanding how these firms have navigated the Modern Slavery Act. The institutional logics literature frequently posits that institutional complexity promotes a reconciliation of competing logics; however, our study uncovers both the phenomenon of interweaving and the persistence of contention between these logics. While acknowledging a potential harmony between market and state principles, a fundamental clash persists, as efforts to combat modern slavery face constraints due to the trade-offs inherent in balancing these two competing logics.

The scholarly discourse on meaningful work has predominantly considered the subjective experience of the individual worker. Subsequently, the literature has fallen short in its theoretical treatment of the cultural and normative facets of meaningful work, possibly even disregarding them entirely. Above all, it has obscured the principle that a person's capacity for finding meaning in their life in general, and particularly in their work, is generally tethered to and dependent on collective societal institutions and cultural ideals. extragenital infection When we ponder the future of work, and specifically the threat of automation-driven unemployment, we gain insight into the cultural and normative dimensions of valuable work. My assertion is that a world offering scarce work prospects is a world without a central societal ideal, thereby straining our capacity to define what constitutes a fulfilling existence. My argument centers on how work functions as a dominant organizing principle, attracting and shaping contemporary life. TVB-3166 clinical trial Work, an ubiquitous force, permeates every facet of our existence, setting the pace for our days and weeks, and providing a foundational structure for our lives. The concept of work is central to understanding human flourishing. Work, through its diverse and multifaceted nature, supplies our material needs, nurtures our abilities and virtues, constructs social bonds, and actively promotes the well-being of all members of our community. Consequently, work stands as a central organizing principle in contemporary Western societies; this fact carries considerable normative weight, significantly influencing our perception of work's meaningfulness.

In their attempts to counteract the rising tide of cyberbullying, governments, institutions, and brands implement a range of intervention strategies, although their efficacy is uncertain. To assess whether hypocrisy induction, a strategy that subtly reminds consumers of their prior actions deviating from their moral values, enhances their support for brand-sponsored anti-cyberbullying CSR initiatives, the authors conduct this study. Findings suggest that inducing hypocrisy results in varied reactions according to regulatory focus, with guilt and shame acting as mediators. Individuals with a pronounced prevention focus, notably, experience feelings of guilt (or shame), which motivates them to ease their discomfort by participating (or shunning) in an anti-cyberbullying campaign. Moral regulation serves as a theoretical anchor to understand consumer reactions to hypocrisy induction, the moderating influence of regulatory focus, and the mediating role of guilt and shame. By examining the dynamics of hypocrisy induction, this research reveals the conditions under which brands can effectively utilize this technique to persuade consumers to support social causes, contributing to the existing literature and supplying practical applications.

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a global problem rooted in coercive control tactics, with financial abuse frequently used to manage and confine an intimate partner in abusive situations. The abuse of financial power limits a person's control over their financial resources and decisions, resulting in their financial dependence, or, conversely, uses their money and economic resources for the abuser's profit. Due to their indispensable role in household finances and the emerging awareness of the need for an equitable society that includes vulnerable consumers, banks are integral to the prevention and reaction to IPV. Abusive partners' financial dominance can be inadvertently reinforced by institutional practices, while seemingly benign regulatory policies and household financial management tools heighten the uneven power distribution in households. Banker professional responsibility has, until recently, been viewed more broadly by business ethicists, notably in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. A minimal analysis researches the conditions, methods, and necessity for a bank to address social problems, such as intimate partner violence, traditionally beyond its core banking responsibilities. I broaden current understanding of 'systemic harm' to examine the bank's role in addressing economic damage caused by IPV, viewing IPV and financial abuse through a consumer vulnerability paradigm to facilitate the transition from theory to practical application. Financial abuse, as exemplified by two meticulously researched stories, highlights the significant part banks can and must take in the fight against such exploitation.

The three-year period following the COVID-19 pandemic has been marked by a notable reshaping of the professional landscape, underscoring the growing importance of scholarly dialogues about the future of work and ethical considerations. Discussions of this nature can offer insights into the conditions under which work is perceived as meaningful, encompassing questions of when, whether, and what types of work receive such recognition. However, discussions to date on ethics, substantive labor, and the future of work have, for the most part, followed distinct courses. The importance of bridging these research spheres extends beyond the advancement of meaningful work as a field of study; it can also provide valuable guidance for shaping the organizations and societies of tomorrow. Motivated by the need to explore these intersecting points, we put together this Special Issue, and we are thankful to the seven selected authors for providing this platform to foster an integrative conversation. Each piece in this publication offers a distinctive perspective on these subjects, some prioritizing ethical considerations while others spotlight the future of worthwhile labor. Focal pathology By combining the arguments of these papers, emerging directions for future research are identified regarding (a) the essence of meaningful employment, (b) the projected future of meaningful labor, and (c) ethical considerations in future studies of meaningful labor. It is our hope that these insights will spark additional meaningful dialogues among scholars and practitioners.